?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Eroticdreambattle [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Tony Grist

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

And Then There's This [Sep. 17th, 2011|10:31 am]
Tony Grist


There are two very similar images of Civil War soldiers posing with a downed pterosaur. The other has been thoroughly debunked as a publicity shot from a TV show. This, anyway, is the better of the two. That pterosaur is impressive.

There are many reasons why it doesn't quite ring true. Go here for evidence of photoshopping.

And then, just look at the soldiers. I'm told the uniforms are authentic, but consider how prosperous and well-groomed they all are. These aren't battlefield troops. And another thing: photography in the 1860s required long time-exposures- which meant people posed stiffly and stared fixedly at the camera. These guys are too casual. They're don't look like people struggling to hold a pose for 15-30 seconds. A defining mark of Victorian photographs- and a reason I love them so- is that the people in them are just so damn intense. 

Finally, is it plausible that such a sensational image could have remained hidden for a century and a half? There were six people present at the incident,  plus the photographer- and none of them went to the press? I don't think so. 
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: michaleen
2011-09-17 11:26 am (UTC)
The shading of their trousers doesn't seem quite right to me, among other things.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2011-09-17 11:46 am (UTC)
Once you start looking at in detail there are lots of things that don't quite convince.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: calizen
2011-09-17 07:03 pm (UTC)
And they somehow look "new" as opposed to the landscape looking more faded in the back.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2011-09-17 08:08 pm (UTC)
Yes, that's wrong. It suggests they don't belong to the background
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)