Tony Grist (poliphilo) wrote,
Tony Grist
poliphilo

Dennis Hopper

Dennis Hopper wasn't my generation; he was the generation before- fifteen years older than me, in fact- but it felt like he was my generation because of his being such a goddam hippy. Whenever and wherever the goddam hippies are discussed his name is likely to come up sooner or later (a) because of his heroically gonzo lifestyle and (b) because of that goddam movie.

I didn't like Easy Rider. Only within the context of the Hollywood studio system could it be seen as in any way revolutionary. We Europeans had been making movies like that- on the hoof, with small crews, with molto improvisation- for ages- mainly because we didn't have any money. Its importance is that it opened Hollywood up to a new generation- and a new- more European- style of film making. 

It's not a particularly good movie- but its a brave one- and you couldn't write the history of the American cinema without nodding in its direction.

I haven't seen any of his other movies as director. I gather they're OK.

As an actor he appeared in a very large number of very good movies- almost always in supporting roles. You'll be watching an old John Wayne movie of the kind that gets shown on weekend afternoons and a very young, scruffy, wild eyed dude will shuffle on screen and give the Duke some lip- and it'll suddenly hit you, "Oh my God, that's Dennis Hopper!" He was always an egomaniac- known for defying directors and displaying artistic temperament even though he was only playing third bad man from the left- in spite of which he kept getting hired-  because- even though they only wanted him as third bad man from the left- he could be counted on to bring bags of moody charisma to the role. He was in Rebel Without a Cause, he was in Giant, he was in True Grit, he was in Apocalypse Now. By the end of his life he'd notched up a number of indelible performances- most notably as Frank Booth in Blue Velvet. He wasn't a great actor, but in the right role under the right director he could be sensational.

He was also an artist, a photographer and an art collector.

Finally there's the legend. The drugs, the booze, the tantrums, the stunts. I don't know how much of it just happened, how much of it was carefully constructed or even how much of it is true, but it's the legend- even more than the work- that makes him the towering cultural figure that he is. He was insanely ambitious, single-minded, self-destructive and strong-willed-  an awful warning and a shining light- and against all the odds he died- at a respectable age- in his bed.

It was a helluva life- and I think we'll be talking about it-  trying to make some sense of it- for a very long time to come. 
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 6 comments