?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Eroticdreambattle [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Tony Grist

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Anglican Follies [Jun. 25th, 2008|10:13 am]
Tony Grist
I can't help but be sorry for the current embarrassments of the Anglican Church. I was raised in it, I used to work for it and it owns all those lovely, medieval buildings. It's a sheep-headed,  rackety, old institution but harmless- as churches go- and at its best promotes a spirituality that's reflective, tolerant and sweet-natured. It has or, rather,  had a genius for compromise. Eyebrows may have been raised over Fr Chasuble's young male lodger but nothing was ever done about it. Mischievous bishops could preach about the Death of God and no-one moved to unseat them.  Evangelicals, liberals, catholics and careerist worldlings all managed- with a little enjoyable feuding and sniping- to rub along together. Ah, well, nothing lasts forever.

And maybe this trouble is all for the best. The worldwide Anglican communion is a product of Empire. And why should the imperial church survive when the Empire itself has gone? Why should Africans conform to English norms of piety and virtue? What's happening now could be interpreted- with the church lagging behind the world by about 50 years (as usual)- as part of the process of decolonisation.

The latest news is that the conservative bishops gathered in Jerusalem are proposing to create a not quite schismatic church within a church- evangelical, fundamentalist, homophobe- and with its centre of authority somewhere other than Canterbury.  It sounds unworkable to me. Also essentially unEnglish.

Just let them go-  make a clean break of it- and take the Bishop of Rochester with them.

But nothing is ever that simple, is it? 

Messes like this take generations to clear up. Look at Zimbabwe.

England is a small country. How nice if the Anglican church could also be small again- based in England with a few Anglophile branches overseas- if it could return to being local:  unworldly-wise, slightly comic, charming.  

The sunlight sloping across vicarage lawns- as in Trollope, as in Agatha Christie, as in The Vicar of Dibley. 

Enough nostalgia!  Why should I worry?  I'm not an Anglican any more...

Or perhaps I am.  Is it possible to wash off the waters of baptism? Is it desirable?

I had a pagan friend once- he's on LJ; I tiptoe round him, hoping he won't spot me- who used to say he was going to write to the Pope asking to be excommunicated. He was a very pretentious, self-important young man. I may once have hated my religious upbringing as much as he hated his- but not any more.
linkReply

Comments:
From: bodhibird
2008-06-25 02:14 pm (UTC)
I'm not sure I get your point, Bishop. "Those people" meaning the Anglican luminaries I cited? Yes, they were all creative folks; for me the Anglican contributions to music and literature remain reasons to love Anglicanism. And yes, they were Royalists, not radicals. I'm not insensible to the political issues in the current controversies; I'm just not sure I care about them.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: seraphimsigrist
2008-06-25 02:37 pm (UTC)

various and on writing

fair enough... no I suppose my thought was
just that they could not be enlisted to a liberal
position really. But that as you say that was
not your intention.
I am sure you are right to avoid as you say
the politics and controversies
I think as surely they are hard to discuss without
becoming isolated from faith and that interiority
which is the ground where Truth beyond all of this
can be accessed or perhaps better can
have access(awkward phrasing
sorry trying to word with attention but that then
it becomes prolix).
well enough from me...
and good luck with writing!, responding much more
simply to your post of the other day about problematics
of writing
yours
+S


(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: bodhibird
2008-06-25 03:05 pm (UTC)

Re: various and on writing

It seems to me that Anglicans, both North and South, have lost the creative, poetic way of thinking which created the great music and literature of the Anglican past; have lost the historic Anglican tolerance for ambiguity, relativity, and disagreements in interpretation; have become as literal and fundamentalist as the Evangelical Protestants of American origin. That is what upsets me about the current controversies, and I usually try to avoid them because the news makes me sad, angry, and perhaps prone to being contentious.

And thanks for the good wishes!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2008-06-25 03:22 pm (UTC)

Re: various and on writing

Well said.

Poor Archbishop Williams- who is an Anglican of the old type- a careful theologian and published poet- is ill-equipped to handle this mess.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)