Tony Grist (poliphilo) wrote,
Tony Grist

Welles's The Trial

I have a passion for Orson Welles. I even own the almost unwatchable Jess Franco cut of Don Quixote.

But I'm a heretic. Kane and Ambersons are the films I like least.

Every one of Welles's films is a quest. What are we looking for? Well, the quarry varies- it could be a man or an abstract truth or even a McGuffin- but whatever it is, we never catch it. We wind up with Rosebud or Arkadin's empty plane or the never-ending war (and absence of Falstaff) that comes with Hal's hollow crown.

The key work is The Trial. A man weaves his way, helter-skelter, though a spectacular labyrinth looking for justice, meaning, himself. It's like the fun-house sequence in Lady from Shanghai stretched out to fill a whole movie. The studio butchered the fun-house sequence. This is where Welles got his revenge.

Welles' Trial is not Kafka's. Kafka is depressive and depressing. Welles is a tragedian but he loves life. If he has a message for us, it's this: don't worry about the destination, just enjoy the passing scenery. K's journey is towards madness and death, but, gee, ain't the Gare d'Orsay wonderful!

Does K die? Kafka's character does- notoriously, "like a dog"- after refusing the option of (assisted) suicide. But Welles's K is left with the choice. The executioners throw him a bomb and he can either hold onto it or chuck it. The camera cuts away- pause- and there's an explosion- and I guess it's up to us to fill in the gap.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.