Tony Grist (poliphilo) wrote,
Tony Grist
poliphilo

Durrington Walls

So there were stones at Durrington Walls- big ones- 15 ft sarsens- apparently arranged in a line along the top of the embankment in the shape- roughly- of a letter "C".  At some point they were taken down and buried (or allowed to become overgrown) on site. In it's heyday- circular earthwork with walls of naked chalk, topped for part of its length with very large standing stones- it must have looked a little like a Greek amphitheatre.

This would seem to be a prehistoric monument unlike any other in Britain. It stands about a mile from Stonehenge and right next to the much smaller Woodhenge, with its south-east entrance located about 100 metres from the course of the River Avon.

Earlier interpretations have read it- in spite of its great size- as subsiduary to Stonehenge. But was it? Have we been misled by its worn-down and denuded present condition? Stonehenge is quite small as henges go while Durrington Walls is enormous- the largest henge in Britain and- with its sarsens in place- must have been hugely impressive.  Perhaps, after all, it's Stonehenge that's the way station in the ritual landscape and Durrington that's the nexus.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 4 comments