?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Eroticdreambattle [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Tony Grist

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Royal Heirs [Jul. 23rd, 2013|08:32 am]
Tony Grist
So now there are three male Windsor in a line of succession that stretches either to the Crack of Doom or the end of the century- whichever comes first.

The royal birth took place in heavy weather and was followed by thunderstorms. Any augurs out there?
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: idahoswede
2013-07-23 07:33 am (UTC)
Now all they need to do is name it John.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2013-07-23 07:49 am (UTC)
How about Stephen? Or Rufus. Rufus is a nice name...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: idahoswede
2013-07-23 08:37 am (UTC)
Stephen - wishy-washy, but I'm actually quite fond of old Rufus myself.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: moth_wingthane
2013-07-23 08:34 am (UTC)
You forgot the full moon. My money is on Damien!

Do I hear the faint strains of O Fortuna?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2013-07-23 09:26 am (UTC)
That's a very pretty name.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: veronica_milvus
2013-07-23 10:18 am (UTC)
It should be Prince Thor, then.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2013-07-24 04:34 pm (UTC)
Excellent suggestion. I reckon it'd be a popular choice too.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: cmcmck
2013-07-23 10:19 am (UTC)
Augurs?

Mediaeval folk would certainly have said so- bad ones too.

Darren?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2013-07-24 04:29 pm (UTC)
What's wrong with Wayne, i'd like to know!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: puddleshark
2013-07-23 10:23 am (UTC)
I think they should take a leaf out of Old Mr Turveydrop's book...

Prince-Prince. It works quite nicely if you add a hyphen.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2013-07-24 04:30 pm (UTC)
That's sweet.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: puddleshark
2013-07-25 09:31 am (UTC)
George is much more suitable, since we seem to be returning to the Georgian era anyway - a vast gulf between rich and poor, social unrest etc...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: artkouros
2013-07-23 12:41 pm (UTC)
How old do they usually get before they start walling each other up in the Tower?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2013-07-24 04:31 pm (UTC)
The little Princes were in their early teens, weren't they?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2013-07-24 04:32 pm (UTC)
Mohammed would be excellent
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: davesmusictank
2013-07-24 07:37 am (UTC)
I actually fancy the name Loki , Norse God of Mischief
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2013-07-24 04:33 pm (UTC)
Very trendy!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: charliemc
2013-07-25 03:49 am (UTC)
I understand the choice of George (sigh) -- the Queen's father's name. But those of us over here (in America) aren't very fond of the name King George (the name of the monarch when we were officially breaking off with England during our Revolution...). Hahahahahahaha.

I really wanted it to be Arthur, because I'm a romantic. But aside from the mythic king, that name hasn't done so well for English monarchs...
(Reply) (Thread)
From: cmcmck
2013-07-25 07:33 am (UTC)
There's also the small matter that the last George, Prince of Cambridge, was a pretty dodgy character.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poliphilo
2013-07-25 11:51 am (UTC)
The Georges haven't been that glamorous a bunch. Two dreary Germans, a madman, a playboy (often characterized as our worst king ever) a crashing bore and a man barely up to the job.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)